The Democratic Party's Unconditional Surrender to Islam
By
Barbara J. Stock
In the days following radical Islam’s attack on
American soil no one could have imagined that America would be standing on the
precipice of total surrender to the enemy. Even the enemy must be shocked that
it has all been so easy.
Americans were united. Politicians stood on the steps of Congress
singing “God Bless America.” President Bush, unlike the previous American
leader, indicated that he had no intention of filing charges against the
terrorists in any court. No, Bush wasn’t hiring any lawyers, he was coming
after them and the American people cheered him. It wasn’t long before
American bombs were killing al Qaeda and its Taliban supporters in
Afghanistan. Then, Saddam Hussein, terrorist supporter and funder, was in
the crosshairs. Bin Laden told his followers not to despair. America is
weak and has no stomach for war, he told them. Some cheap bombs and a few
hundred suicide bombers later, it appears bin Laden was right.
The mighty “Great Satan” falling to the followers of Allah so quickly
is quite a coup for radical Islam. Thousands upon thousands of Muslims
sitting on the fence will make their decision to follow the radical leaders
based on Senator Reid’s unconditional surrender to Islam. If Reid and
Pelosi knew where to send the articles of an unconditional surrender, there
is little doubt they would have done it. With that not available to them,
the Democrat leaders have done the next best thing: they announced our
surrender on world television.
It took bin Laden ten years to defeat the Soviets and
even then, he needed help and weapons from the United States to accomplish
it. Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Liberation Army still have not
defeated the “Little Satan,” Israel, after 50 years and several wars.
Defeating America with a small investment of a few thousand followers must
have stunned the Islamics who did not expect such an easy victory. How
easily the mighty fall. The Middle East will soon be theirs. Europe will
soon be theirs, as well. Plans for Islam to dominate the world seem to be
ahead of schedule.
The urgency of a quick surrender and retreat from Iraq by the
Democratic Party borders on bewildering. In a recent debate between
Democratic hopefuls it seemed that one was trying to out-bid the other with
earlier dates that troops would be withdrawn from Iraq. When asked to raise
their hands if they believed there even was a “world war against
terrorists,” John Edwards and Senator Joe Biden did not even raise their
hands.
While House Speaker Pelosi has time to fly to Syria and meet with
President Bashar al-Assad, she cannot find the time to meet with General
Petraeus, who is in charge of the new offensive in Iraq against al Qaeda.
Syria is suspect in several assassinations in Lebanon and is allowing
fighters to cross its border in Iraq to kill Americans. Yet, there was Ms.
Pelosi, trying to play president while posing for photo-ops with an Islamic
terrorist.
The majority leader of the United States Senate, Harry
Reid, D-Nev., told reporters that he will listen to General Petraeus, but he
will not believe him. Senator Reid said, “No, I don't believe him, because
it's not happening.” Why should our generals make the trip to Washington to
testify before Congress when half of Congress either doesn’t show up or
calls them liars? Reid, the Democrat leader in the United States Senate not
only has declared the war is lost but that our military leaders are nothing
but liars, and he has done all this publicly.
Perhaps more amazing is the fact that the liberals in America still do
not realize who the enemy is and what it is capable of. At that same recent
debate, Senator Obama, D-Ill., when asked what he would do in the event of
another terrorist attack, Obama compared it to a natural disaster and
proclaimed that he would make sure that there were enough rescue people to
pick up the bodies.
While Senator Clinton, D-N.Y., said she would retaliate, she would do
so only after conclusively knowing who was responsible. One should know by
now who would be responsible; the trick is finding them. Radical Islam is a
faceless, countryless entity. It is here, it is there, it is everywhere.
Who should we attack first, Senator Clinton?
Known terrorist leaders were thrilled with the vote in the
Democrat-majority Congress. Abu Nasser Aziz, the deputy commander of the Al
Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, was pleased with the vote as well as with what he
heard in the first Democratic debate. In a statement to the Middle Eastern
media, his comment was: "I think the more Americans receive the bodies of
soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, the more the conservatives in the
U.S. will be sentenced to be thrown in the garbage."
How can liberals continue to claim their bugles of retreat are not
endangering our troops with comments such as the one made by Aziz?
Terrorist logic is: Kill more American soldiers and those who wish to fight
us will be shouted down, the weak will win, and Islamic victory will be
assured.
Yet, the Democrat hopefuls continue to wave the white flag. John
Edwards now says he would withdraw our troops from Iraq immediately if he
were president. Leftists seem to be falling all over themselves to be the
first to surrender--and they are proud of it.
There is little hope now that this war with radical Islam can be kept
at bay and off American soil. This vicious enemy thrives on weakness and
that is what it has seen now from Americans. The missing element is that
when the attacks start--and they will--these Islamics will be shocked at how
quickly the average American will demand retaliation. The whimpering
appeasers such as Reid and Pelosi will reverse themselves and be in full
denial that they ever surrendered at all.
In truth, it will be Reid and Pelosi and those who have done their
bidding that will be responsible for every dead American killed by suicide
bombers, car bombs, or worse. Their gross underestimation of the enemy has
put America in an untenable situation, and they and their party will have a
lot to answer for.