The Year of the Stunt

I recently accused our own President Bush of manipulative stunts, so it is only fair that I reveal the Democrats as equally adept in this art; point in case, Obama Barak. I can only believe that Obama (Osama) is only a political strategy trick to make Hillary more palatable to the moderate voter. It is so transparent how details of Obama's disturbing past spent in Wahabi madrasas are casually being released by the MSM. Also his alleged Christianity is shown to be very much in conflict with his legislative voting record. All this guy needs is a triple-six tattoo and the anti-Christ analogy would be complete.

So have the Dem political strategists put up a straw-man? Have they purposely put up a Black man with disturbing ties to Islamofascism as candidate for Presidential nomination? Talk about pushing the fear factor. Are they cynically stoking the fires of working class racism? Islamophobia?

If in fact, Liberals are not just a bunch of degenerates, but a people adherent to a vastly different paradigm, then it is entirely possible that even within their paradigm, Liberals, like Conservatives also vote for the least of all evils.

So, what is worse, a Socialist, mercurial, power-mad, psycho-bitch or a crypto-Muslim? That is one serious hell of a choice for the Democrats to have to make at their next National Convention. All I know is that just about any Republican candidate has a better chance of defeating Obama than they have of defeating Hillary.

Is the American voter so angry at our government's pathetic performance that the next vote in 2008 will be another protest vote? How would that shape-out? Could it all end up as a Democrat majority in the Congress, but not large enough to overcome a veto, and a staunch Republican Conservative in the White House? 

Will we see a voter engineered grid-lock? Is that really the best of all worlds? Some believe so, I only worry that this "stunt" is being played-out in a time of war. So far, there's nothing to smile about in the horizon.

Treading Water

If the German prosecutor takes the war crimes case against Rumsfeld and the Bush Cabinet, he will be a hero in Euro-socialist circles. Rumsfeld and all others if (or when) charged with war crimes can (and probably will) be convicted in absentia. If the case is prosecuted, Rumsfeld will most likely be convicted because he will not submit himself (make himself present) to the German court, and that will rankle the proud German judiciary. 

Any covert efforts or retaliation by the United States to thwart the prosecution will be widely exposed by the mainstream media and the ‘covert operatives’ will be hung out in the wind. The international community will side with the German prosecutor. Every ounce of envy that the world has had at American power will be brought to play. 

Pundits in the upcoming Hillary Clinton administration will publicly debate protecting Rumsfeld or restoring the friendship with their Euro-Socialist brethren. Even if Rumsfeld and the rest are never turned over, the public pressure on them will be more than enough to justify suicide. 

No one else will dare take up the Crusader mantle after this.

The Europeans can do this, they know they can do this and make enough international trouble to get the Liberal Dems in power to either acquiesce their legal jurisdiction, or at least switch to full-apologetics kiss-Euro-ass, kiss-Arab-ass mode. Either way they win.

Some might argue that the European Socialists don't have a choice in the matter. Fifty million restive Muslims within their borders can be quite a threat. You can't very well shoot the rats when they are inside your underwear with you. But they let that happen to themselves.

The Germans are out of bullshit options. They painted themselves into a corner with their last assertion that “The US Courts will take up the matter.” It will be either to prosecute, or to suffer internal unrest at the hand of the Muslims. It’s a squeeze play by the International Hard Left, brilliant in its timing and execution.

The only other option is for American courts to take up the “challenge” and conduct their own War Crimes tribunal of sorts. I believe Waxman of West LA may be preparing that as I write this. Any way you look at it, this turn of events will make it impossible for any other prominent American politician to truly take up the fight against Islamofascism.

Don’t forget that the American military is civilian controlled. All the heroism and sacrifice, if mis-directed will be a simple waste of American lives and talent. All our War on Terror activities from now on will be staged for public consumption. They will be elaborate Hollywood-like productions to give the American voter the feeling that something is really being done; lots of drama, little or no real progress.

In closing, I wish to say that a ship of state can not negotiate the rough straits of warfare when half the crew is drilling holes under the water-line. Our Republican ship just sank; too bad it was carrying my America. I call it treason most foul.

So where does this put you and me? For I assume since you bother to read this column, my views resonate with yours. I’m afraid this thing puts us in the drink. We are now treading water and very far away from land.

Sorry folks, but that's how I see it. By using the Islamist menace, the international secular Socialist movement is poised to check-mate the Judeo-Christian world. The New World Order will be strictly secular.

It could be that all this was inevitable, … pre-ordained, … part of the prophesied end-times. It could also be that in my love for my young family, I thought that by writing these opinions I could help forestall, or delay that fateful day. Foolish of me wasn’t it?

Maybe God will forgive my arrogance.